• xijinpingist [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      The highest denomination is 100 yuan, about $17. There are stories of aunties who had literal whole apartments stacked floor to ceiling with boxes of banknotes from running(for example) an aluminum recycling business in the reform and opening up days. A staple of “China foreigner” photos used to be flashing a big gangster roll of five figures of yuan which wasn’t really that much, a few thousand bucks but sure looked like it. China invented paper money and they’ll be the first to eliminate it. Alipay and Wechat are payments for everything now. It’s getting harder and harder to use cash. People will take it but sometimes can’t give change except if they transfer it to you on your phone. It’s eliminated pickpockets though.

      • xijinpingist [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        1 fen coins. They had those way back when. light as a feather and 1/100 of a yuan. One mao is1/10. I still have some left from my coin jar, trying to use them up buying bread in the next few weeks.

        • Krem [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          i think i got those as change by accident years ago (but still long after they were discontinued). feels like plastic or aluminium.

          the 1-mao and 5-mao notes are still around and pretty beautiful too

          • xijinpingist [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            One of my goals was to go to every location on every bill and get my photo taken, holding the bill.
            I got the 100 in Beijing and the 1 in Hangzhou westlake but never the others. Maybe I will still, even though cash is 98% obsolete by now.

            • Krem [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Is it the 5 or 10 that has Yangshuo? I got that one

              I tried and failed a couple of times (personal reasons) to go to Huangshan (which iirc is the 5 or 10 that Yangshuo isn’t)

    • KobaCumTribute [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      3 months ago

      I assume the point is to get them to cooperate and force them into a “no seriously stop doing shit, don’t try to keep wielding power or doing more crimes, sit down, shut up, and do your time” position without the consequences of actually just executing them. Like in practical terms what’s the difference between “they’re sitting in a cell and can’t keep being the ringleader of something or trading favors or whatever because if they do that’s it for them” and “they’re actually gone forever, but someone had to do it to them”? In the latter case you’ve made someone deal with killing them, and you also have no further stick to force them to not fight back as hard as they can before that point with every connection or hidden asset they may have.

  • HeroHelck@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    I mean, did they fix the systemic problems that allowed this to happen in the first place? Are these death sentences actually carried out? Still a mile better than Amerikkkan “justice” but too much of this reeks of an attempt to placate rather than actually fix anything.

        • TreadOnMe [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Don’t be vague, be specific. What exactly do you think is causing it?

          You can have it both ways, it could be a systemic element that can, at some point be solved or reduced, and/or it could be an endemic element of some aspect of human society writ large that can never be solved, only the symptoms treated.

          Either way the key is, which do you think takes precedence? Why do you think that? Could it be that you may have been brought up in the most corrupt society of all time, and therefore literally cannot imagine a society that works for more than just the benefit of the owner class?

          • HeroHelck@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Oh, I’m really regretting running my mouth now, fair warning, I’m pretty terrible at disputation, but I’ll do my best.

            Don’t be vague, be specific. What exactly do you think is causing it?

            Hierarchical authority, particularly with a strong top-down dynamic. This level of graft is quite impressive, it’s very hard to believe that this was ever fully concealed from his superiors, and particularly from his underlings. Why is it then, that those above him did not see fit to stop him, and why were those below not able to stop it in the near twenty years before the 2019 investigation? We can reach any number of conclusions, most of them probably wrong, as the CCP has been opaque in this matter as is their right. Yet it’s clear that his position of power within the CCP is what enabled him (at least in part) to steal so much.

            You can have it both ways, it could be a systemic element that can, at some point be solved or reduced, and/or it could be an endemic element of some aspect of human society writ large that can never be solved, only the symptoms treated.

            That systems of hierarchy lead to abuse isn’t a new observation, I’d argue it’s axiomatic. Are systems of hierarchy a necessity to human society? No, I do not think so, or more specifically, I don’t believe that such top down systems are. So in short, yes it’s the system, that humans make such a system is true, that humans must make such a system is not. Also, yes, it can be ameliorated, I applaud any effort to do so, just as I applaud the CCP for tackling this monster. That may have not come through in my post, but I hope you can forgive me a small amount of cynicism here.

            which do you think takes precedence? Why do you think that?

            Put simply, I don’t believe that simply destroying the basal relations of production is going to automatically correct super-structural issues in society. It’s my belief that superstructures can exist independent of the base, often conflict with the base, and often are the contradictions that can lead to social revolution.

            Could it be that you may have been brought up in the most corrupt society of all time, and therefore literally cannot imagine a society that works for more than just the benefit of the owner class?

            I wanna address this sentence, because it felt a little mean spirited, or at least overly indulging in a rhetorical cheap kick. It’s possible I’m being overly sensitive here, I frequently am, but this kinda feels like your accusing me of being a crypto-lib or something. I promise you, I’m not, and beyond a pretty milquetoast “be better” criticism of the CCP, I don’t know what I’ve said that would lead you to make such an accusation.

        • xijinpingist [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          In Hangzhou way back in the day there was a 1:1 replica of the White House in Americaland. Including the Oval Office and the infamous “blowjob nook”. It had a cardboard cutout of Bill Clinton behind the Resolute Desk and oh, the jokes everyone made. I have photos of it somewhere in my untagged collection of gigabytes of China photos. It had been closed and turned into a school by then but you could still come in and see it.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Yep, we’ve got to start punishing political corruption as harshly as mass murder, because it truly has that potential.

    Criminals are choosing to operate in the political arena because they can steal more, get away with it easier, and if they do get caught, the punishments are nearly non-existent. The only way to chase them out of government is to make it such a hostile environment for crime that it’s just easier to ply their trade elsewhere.

    Steal millions from the people, and you get the death penalty. Do that a few times, and it will discourage future dipshits pretty effectively.

  • Juice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    State sponsored violence, as well as every other function of the state, is always a way to mitigate class antagonisms

    • Muad'Dibber@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The state’s role is not to “mitigate” or “settle disputes” or “act as referree” between classes, that’s only a fiction that liberals believe about their governments. Its to act in the interest of one class against the other.

      The PRC is a worker’s state, which is why they harshly punish these execs found to be committing financial crimes.

      • Juice@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        “Mob violence” completely misses the point imo. I wouldn’t condemn it, since it is an authentic expression of popular anger against systems that threaten people’s lives. Also I’m very in favor of people organizing for their own defense. But that is just one teensy part of what is needed. By the time we are organized enough to cause major trouble, like, capable of withstanding countless assaults on some field of battle, and growing to the point that a municipal police force couldn’t handle us, we would be so organized and militant that committing violence wouldnt be necessary, and would actually hinder our ability to be effective at reaching the most people.

        Look at the anti ICE movements in Chicago, Charlotte, NC, Los Angeles, Minneapolis, Portland, etc., we saw riots on the news but in the streets there was, and still is, deep organization; each iteration actually gets less violent and more effective, all of these movements not just coordinating with each other, but launching extensive training programs to provide the services and defense that the people in those communities who are most affected by fascist violence, actually need.

        So sure, maybe a little mob violence as a treat, after all its the cops who are going to start it anyway. I just think if we want a more just world, then we have to have a higher standard of justice than the current rulers.

        • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’m not suggesting we are anywhere near applying Mob Violence, but we have to know, and especially THEY have to know, that it’s a genuine potential option, although as a worst case scenario option.

          What’s more likely to happen with these SlaughterBots is that some 12 year old hacker(z) will get into the programming in about 15 minutes, and turn them all back on their masters.

          • Juice@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            I am so plugged in to advancements in drone warfare. Theres some really scary shit going down in Ukraine, for example, a drone that can monitor a huge area and take out vehicles from kilometers away. But also stories like a young Ukrainian “hacker” who figured out how to fire nets out of a shotgun for cheap, disabling airborne drones reliably from the ground. Sounds like a kick ass weekend project tbh

            • TreadOnMe [none/use name]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              That story is such crap. Both sides have been using netting against drones since things really got underway. Firing nets from a cannon will not help you when there is a double tap. High up, difficult to see, netting emplacements are the only real way to mitigate drones (when used with fiber optics cables, otherwise signal scrambling works extremely well). It’s why the war is such a grind.

    • TheEgoBot@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      3 months ago

      Ideally people who understand that it’s wrong to steal and hoard billions worth of resources from their communities, it’s a pretty low bar tbf

      • underisk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        So low. Practically floor level. Somehow US politicians just keep tripping over it, though.

    • Cowbee [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 months ago

      Dedicated party cadres. Corruption isn’t the end of governance, just like you need to dust and clean every once in a while you need to stay vigilant against it and remove corrupt officials when found.