You’re using the same logic my dad uses to rail against going to Mars. He says there is no worthwhile reason to go there when more pressing matters on earth are in abundance.

Just like you, he is missing the forest for the trees, angrily ignorant to the fact that the knowledge you gained from trying to achieve a seemingly worthless achievement is the actual value, not in the achievement itself.

The achievement is just a convenient goal to make the science more exciting to the general public so as to garner more financial support from both private and government sources. Each of the steps needed to gain that achievement may not have gained as much funding as they do now if they were presented separately from that final goal.

The Democrats WAS offering something terrible. Just because Trump is worse, doesn’t make what the Dem offered not terrible. If your side had acknowledged this instead of attacking everyone who tried to tell you, maybe you’d have a chance at making the DNC offer something that the voters actually wanted and actually be able to beat Trump. But no, instead everyone that wasn’t blindly accepting everything the Dems offered is treated like the enemy before the election, and now you even continue doing so after the election.

You’re just living in la la land if you think doing this will make people finally support your cause. This is why I say you’re acting smug. You only care that you were right over these people, and not over the consequences of your action on your country’s ability to fight full-on fascism in the near future. What you’re doing is the same as the non-voters, making the wrong choice for the sake of teaching the non-voters a “lesson”. It’s just another chain of stupid decisions the non-fascists are making to enable the rise of fascism.

I’d say good luck dealing with the consequences if you decide to continue doing this. I might not be directly affected by this, by I would definitely feel the fallout after the fact. At that time, I won’t be blaming you any less for enabling fascism than the non-voters.

Why don’t you blame the cause for there to be so many apathetic people in your country instead of blaming the people who were only reacting to the treatment they’ve been given up to now?

It seems you people really love victim blaming when it conveniences you. I swear your insistence on acting smug for being the “right voter” is what will let Trump get full control of your country.

Hey, at least you can scream that you were right while your country crumbles around you. I’m sure that’s worth something.

Will Americans get tired of being pushed around? They seem to prefer helping the fascists by pushing each other around instead, judging by the repeated attempts on Lemmy to place everything Trump does squarely under the responsibility of the non-voters.

From my outside perspective, they like acting as the victim too much to actually fight back.

Somehow the same logic is not applied when people talk about Linux. It’s always the developers fault if something doesn’t work on it, such as multiplayer games, standard engineering softwares, or even computer accessories.

The inclusion of those words is in the context of the post, which only talks about aid to people outside the US. Why would they talk about people inside the US or even imply they care about those people?

If I say I like the outside, that doesn’t imply I hate staying inside. You logic is akin to insisting I hate staying inside because I wouldn’t have included the word outside if I wasn’t trying to imply that.

Why?

No, that’s literally not what they implied. You’re unironically doing the “so you hate waffles?” thing.

Not really. It has more of a “show us what you consider good so we can tell whether your taste is actually decent and your opinion is worth considering, or your taste is kinda whack in the first place” energy.

Interesting, thanks for answering me. I didn’t know about this.

Can you explain how port forwarding is used for torrenting and how it works with other VPNs?

He didn’t say he didn’t care. Clearly, him asking the question means he cared enough to ask if this is something he should care about.

No, coffee is burnt coffee milk. We need actual raw coffee milk.

Most people are born into their religion, so they didn’t choose it either. It’s also not easy to change your religion when everyone around you and your culture is based around that religion. So your logic is simply based on dumb ignorance of the world.

That means you logic made no sense, as well.

Yeah, you’ve proven that you have trouble with reading, got it. I won’t bother reading your other comments, next time.

Bruh, if you can’t be bothered to read, why are you replying? No wonder your reply made no sense.

Your initial comment seems to imply that it won’t be a problem for the US army to fight against the cartel, which the other guy was arguing against by giving examples of how bad their performance has been against guerilla fighters.

You replied by asking him which army isn’t bad at fighting guerilla warfare? His point wasn’t that the US army is the only one bad at fighting guerilla warfare. Your rebuttal even goes against your original point that the US won’t have trouble with fighting the cartel, so it doesn’t even work as a supporting argument for your own point.

With all the trouble Americans have caused the world, I can’t wait for you to advocate treating Americans as a mental illness, as well

Is that supposed to be a rebuttal against his point?

So they already knew how to beat Trump, yet they decided against doing so. So it’s still their fault.