• Jah348@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    It looks to me like a completely unnecessary solution. Covering up the water is a good idea, but find an immediate and cost affective way to do it. Loads of custom ineffectively laid out solar panels is not that.

    It’s not as though we have a surplus of solar panels that need a place to go. If the money is being invested, place them in a location with them oriented toward the sun and not above water.

    • oo1@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      yeah fill up flat-roof buildings first - before even thinking about any of these wacko things.
      it’s nearest to electricity demand so less distribution losses.
      and access for maintenance is probably already there.

        • ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          meh, #fuckCars… let them burn. I’d rather see solar covered cycling paths keeping cyclists dry. And solar covered bus/tram/train stop shelters, which could power the ETA display.