The no pamphlet: campaign’s voice to parliament referendum essay – annotated and factchecked
www.theguardian.com
Pamphlets written by politicians and published by the AEC have put the official case for a yes and no vote. They were not independently factchecked before publication, so Guardian Australia has added notes to the full essays to help you make better sense of them

Includes some useful answers to concerns people may have about voting yes.

  • Affidavit@aussie.zone
    0·
    2 years ago

    It is abundantly clear that the alleged ‘journalist’ responsible for fact-checking this had an ulterior motive.

    1. The High Court does interpret constitutional legislation
    2. The ambiguity does include a risk of delays and dysfunction due to poor wording in the proposed legislation
    3. Australians wanting to know what they are actually voting for is not ‘misinformation’.

    …

    I stopped wasting my time here. It is clear that whomever did this assessment was being disingenuous. Won’t waste my time reading further.