Drew@sopuli.xyzM to LinkedinLunatics@sh.itjust.works · 9 months agoBelchingsopuli.xyzimagemessage-square77fedilinkarrow-up1324arrow-down127
arrow-up1297arrow-down1imageBelchingsopuli.xyzDrew@sopuli.xyzM to LinkedinLunatics@sh.itjust.works · 9 months agomessage-square77fedilink
minus-squarefibojoly@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up35arrow-down2·edit-29 months agoShould be age > (my_age / 2) +7
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·9 months agoWhy would there be an age and my_age column on the table GIRLS?
minus-squarelennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up10·9 months agoGood point. Should be age > (@my_age / 2) +7 FTFOP - now my age is some value defined outside the immediate query. More likely, the GIRLS would be a view of some table persons and you could query my_age from that table too.
minus-squarefibojoly@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-29 months agoThank you. I assumed the reader would be educated enough to guess I meant a variable. But yeah, should used @my_age
minus-squarelennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3·9 months agoPretty sure “People who know enough about SQL to know about variables” is a subset of “People who know enough about SQL to be pedantic about it” :p
minus-squarejol@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3·9 months agoBecause for each girl you meet, you might tell her a different age.
minus-squareCaveman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·9 months agoFound the programmer thread that criticises the data model instead of the t-shirt
minus-squareGladaed@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down2·9 months agoOr (my_age - 7) * 2 < age < (my_age / 2) +7`
minus-squarefibojoly@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·9 months agoUh, no no. The rule is “half my age plus seven”. I’ve no idea what your other term is supposed to represent.
minus-squareji17br@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4·9 months agoHe’s saying it goes both ways. The upper limit is a women who you would be half her age plus 7.
minus-squareabsGeekNZ@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·9 months agoThis “rule” only works for a small set of ages from 14 ~ 30ish If you are 14 then the range for “age” is 14 - 14 If you are 30 then the range for “age” is 22 - 46 If you are 40 then the range for “age” is 27 - 66 At 30 the upper level is 16 years different; while it could work it is a big gap to bridge. It only gets worse the older you get.
Should be
age > (my_age / 2) +7Why would there be an age and my_age column on the table GIRLS?
Good point.
FTFOP - now my age is some value defined outside the immediate query.
More likely, the GIRLS would be a view of some table persons and you could query
my_agefrom that table too.Thank you. I assumed the reader would be educated enough to guess I meant a variable. But yeah, should used @my_age
Pretty sure “People who know enough about SQL to know about variables” is a subset of “People who know enough about SQL to be pedantic about it” :p
A fair point :D
Because for each girl you meet, you might tell her a different age.
Found the programmer thread that criticises the data model instead of the t-shirt
Or (my_age - 7) * 2 < age < (my_age / 2) +7`
deleted by creator
Uh, no no. The rule is “half my age plus seven”. I’ve no idea what your other term is supposed to represent.
He’s saying it goes both ways. The upper limit is a women who you would be half her age plus 7.
This “rule” only works for a small set of ages from 14 ~ 30ish
If you are 14 then the range for “age” is 14 - 14
If you are 30 then the range for “age” is 22 - 46
If you are 40 then the range for “age” is 27 - 66
At 30 the upper level is 16 years different; while it could work it is a big gap to bridge. It only gets worse the older you get.