banner80@fedia.io to Memes@lemmy.ml · 11 个月前Never tire of winningfedia.ioimagemessage-square126fedilinkarrow-up11.54Karrow-down153
arrow-up11.48Karrow-down1imageNever tire of winningfedia.iobanner80@fedia.io to Memes@lemmy.ml · 11 个月前message-square126fedilink
minus-squareKⒶMⒶLⒶ WⒶLZ 2Ⓐ24@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·11 个月前you didn’t need to but you did choose to preface this with “technically” which should have tipped you off that this really isn’t in the same arena.
minus-squareAngryCommieKender@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·11 个月前No, but it is an excuse to share this article about that law. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/15/us/politics/qualified-immunity-supreme-court.html This really means that Harlow v Fitzgerald should be overturned.
you didn’t need to but you did choose to preface this with “technically” which should have tipped you off that this really isn’t in the same arena.
No, but it is an excuse to share this article about that law.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/15/us/politics/qualified-immunity-supreme-court.html
This really means that Harlow v Fitzgerald should be overturned.