COMHASH@lemmygrad.mlBanned to GenZedong@lemmygrad.ml · 2 years agoNext war is on Chinalemmygrad.mlimagemessage-square109linkfedilinkarrow-up1177arrow-down19
arrow-up1168arrow-down1imageNext war is on Chinalemmygrad.mlCOMHASH@lemmygrad.mlBanned to GenZedong@lemmygrad.ml · 2 years agomessage-square109linkfedilink
minus-squareLarkinDePark@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up24arrow-down1·2 years agoHow would Microsoft even know this? They make software, they’re not a counter espionage group. It’s just some poor appeal to authority or something.
minus-squareGaveUp [she/her]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24·2 years agoMicrosoft definitely has a large enough employee base of security dweebs to put together a team to do stuff like this for a government contract
minus-squareLarkinDePark@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down1·2 years agoIf it’s for a government contract then they wouldn’t say “Microsoft Says”. It would just be, “We have evidence…”. This easy they get to keep their distance from the claim.
minus-squareBetter Red Than Dead@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·2 years agoFinancial interests maybe? Though I don’t see how
minus-squareWayeeCool [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agodeleted by creator
How would Microsoft even know this? They make software, they’re not a counter espionage group. It’s just some poor appeal to authority or something.
Microsoft definitely has a large enough employee base of security dweebs to put together a team to do stuff like this for a government contract
If it’s for a government contract then they wouldn’t say “Microsoft Says”. It would just be, “We have evidence…”. This easy they get to keep their distance from the claim.
Financial interests maybe? Though I don’t see how
deleted by creator