Seagoon_@aussie.zone to Melbourne@aussie.zone · 7 个月前Daily Discussion Thread: 🐦⬛🧙🐈⬛👻🦇 Monday, October 28, 2024message-squaremessage-square178fedilinkarrow-up122arrow-down11
arrow-up121arrow-down1message-squareDaily Discussion Thread: 🐦⬛🧙🐈⬛👻🦇 Monday, October 28, 2024Seagoon_@aussie.zone to Melbourne@aussie.zone · 7 个月前message-square178fedilink
minus-squarePilk@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·7 个月前This is quite a take. Regulation could be government overreach, but banning social media outright is not?
minus-squareStudSpud The Starchy@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 个月前Yeah who’s doing the banning? The government? Who can also… Regulate… I think they’d regulate. Hard to argue that regulation is more overreaching than banning lol
minus-squareSeagoon_@aussie.zoneOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 个月前These rights of free speech are part of the social contract. People who break that social contract to bring down the system of freedoms or to do harm to others have that right revoked. No one has the right to use freedom to trample others.
it should be regulated
deleted by creator
This is quite a take. Regulation could be government overreach, but banning social media outright is not?
deleted by creator
Yeah who’s doing the banning? The government? Who can also… Regulate…
I think they’d regulate. Hard to argue that regulation is more overreaching than banning lol
These rights of free speech are part of the social contract. People who break that social contract to bring down the system of freedoms or to do harm to others have that right revoked.
No one has the right to use freedom to trample others.