Home Office failed to show presence of Dana Abu Qamar ‘not conducive to public good’, according to tribunal ruling
  • Grimy@lemmy.world
    7·
    5 months ago

    You are justifying an apartheid state, none of what you are saying is disproving the fact that Israel is one.

    The civilian population is no shield against a blockade.

    The civilian population shouldn’t have to deal with a blockade, indiscriminate bombing, apartheid or genocide.

    That’s the point. This isn’t taking care of business or self defense, it’s ethnic cleansing.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        9·
        5 months ago

        Despite the Israeli disengagement, Gaza is still considered occupied by Israel under international law.

        Open air prison, apartheid and genocide. Go shill for netanyahu somewhere else.

          • Pup Biru@aussie.zoneEnglish
            6·
            5 months ago

            hey, they never said it was one-sided. the comments above were merely refusing to acknowledge israel as an apartheid state… it can both be true that israel is an apartheid state committing genocide, AND that hamas launched indiscriminate rockets into israel and both those things can be indefensible