• sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Options:

    • high quality remaster of older game (FO4, FONV, etc)
    • reuse FO76 engine to make a new game, with a few graphical upgrades
    • story DLC releases for older games

    Any of those could’ve been done in the time they’d know about the FO show release target.

    • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      much of a game’s development time is spent creating assets, using a new engine doesn’t mean your existing low fidelity assets suddenly look better, just better lit

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Eh, a lot of it also has to do with designing things, not the producing assets. If you’re just doing a remaster and upgrading assets that already exist, it should take a lot less time than building something from scratch.

        • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          that’s just simply not true. if you look at the project lifecycle for a game very little resources are spent in preproduction, the bulk of the time is in production. preproduction usually has all of the core mechanics and ideas implemented by the end, then it’s just about executing on that plan. there’s not a lot of experimentation and iteration once you are in full tilt production mode

    • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      reuse FO76 engine to make a new game, with a few graphical upgrades

      They did do that. It was called Starfield.