Lemdro.id
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Quaxamilliom [comrade/them]@hexbear.net to the_dunk_tank@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 years ago

lol, lmao even

hexbear.net

message-square
150
link
fedilink
185

lol, lmao even

hexbear.net

Quaxamilliom [comrade/them]@hexbear.net to the_dunk_tank@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 years ago
message-square
150
link
fedilink

https://www.reddit.com/r/legaladvice/comments/16pubsd/elderly_father_was_convinced_to_sign_over_the/

  • berrytopylus [she/her,they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    2 years ago

    I was told landlords did a lot of work to earn their money? If he’s clearly well enough to do such intense labor like owning property then he must be in good mental condition.

    • SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      We cant just want the law to be upheld in situations we like dude.

      Edit; Ive had why my views are wrong explained to me. Ive learned.

      • Self_Hating_Moid [he/him]@hexbear.netBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        76
        ·
        2 years ago

        Its funny when landlords get fucked over, actually

        • SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          Totally agree. But I wouldnt like it if someone misled my parents like this and took the house they actually live in, so I dont like this.

          • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            73
            ·
            2 years ago

            This was a renter taking the house that they, the renter, lived in

            • SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Yes, where are you confused.

              • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                62
                ·
                2 years ago

                It was not depriving someone of ownership of the house they lived in but precisely the opposite of that, granting someone that ownership.

                • SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Yeah…take the landlord element out of it.

                  • Kuori [she/her]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    59
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    but then that would be a completely different situation. why would you expect people to feel the same way about a completely different situation?

                  • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    17
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    Now if you replace landlord with Jew, then think about it tankies smuglord

                  • asa_red_heathen [he/him]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    12
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    What if the world was made out of pudding

          • Gay_Tomato [they/them, it/its]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            41
            ·
            2 years ago

            He’s a landlord, that wasn’t the house he lived in…

            • SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Yes. I read that. Youre not getting my point.

              • Gay_Tomato [they/them, it/its]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                40
                ·
                2 years ago

                The problem is your orginal statement. “Wanting the law to be upheld only in situations you like” would cover your parents. A law system that would not invoke such a desire cannot exist in a society that still has landlords.

                • SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Yeah, we should ban landleeches. Unfortunately that wont happen cause money talks.

                  • PbSO4 [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    15
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    If only there was some other place besides money that political power could grow from

      • AOCapitulator [they/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        53
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Who the fuck wants racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, and anti-worker capitalist laws upheld?

        ‘The rule of law’ is a cloud of toxic farts youve been sniffing your whole life while the ruling class hang out on their mega yachts and in their towers (breaking any and all ‘laws’ they want)

        all landlords should be given the choice between immediate execution and having their property expropriated, and having their property expropriated

        • SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          Who the fuck wants racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, and anti-worker capitalist laws upheld?

          Not me. Do you?

          ‘The rule of law’ is a cloud of toxic farts youve been sniffing your whole life while the ruling class hang out on their mega yachts and in their towers (breaking any and all ‘laws’ they want)

          Totally agree.

          all landlords should be given the choice between immediate execution and having their property expropriated, and having their property expropriated

          Thats fine. Everything youve said has fuck all to do with everything Ive said…

          • AOCapitulator [they/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            2 years ago

            this is a great bit good job

            • SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              Thank you.

              • AOCapitulator [they/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                Really had me goin at first

                • SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Nah, I’ve learned my lessons.

                  • AOCapitulator [they/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    What lessons were those, if you don’t mind me asking?

          • Dontfearthereaper123@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 years ago

            U said “u can’t just not want the law to be upheld in some situations” so his question “do u want racist, sexist, etc laws to be upheld” Is a relevant question I am curious abt ur answer btw because uve given 2 seperate answers

            • SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Removed by mod

      • ProxyTheAwesome [comrade/them]@hexbear.netBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah we can

      • Gay_Tomato [they/them, it/its]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        We cant just want the law to be upheld in situations we like dude.

        yes-chad

        • SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Thats fine.

      • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        2 years ago

        If your stance is the destruction of the state, then using or avoiding its legal system by whatever means necessary to further the project of undermining it is a coherent position.

        • SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yeah, true.

      • MF_COOM [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        2 years ago

        huey-wut

        • SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yup.

          • MF_COOM [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            29
            ·
            2 years ago

            You don’t have some hot take. You have no idea what you’re talking about. Literally no one here only wants renters to only take possession of their homes in special cases, nor do we give a fuck about laws that protect landlords.

            • SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              Do you have no reading compreshension? Take the landlord element out of it.

              • MF_COOM [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                28
                ·
                2 years ago

                Because I have reading comprehension I understand that you made am ambiguous statement. In my generosity I interpreted you as saying something much less dumb. If your take is that we need to obey the laws that benefit the rich and powerful because if we don’t how are we going to enforce drunk driving or age of consent that’s some real smooth brain shit.

                So yeah sorry for giving you the benefit of the doubt don’t worry it won’t happen again che-smile

                • SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Honestly …its the principle, I couldnt care less that some land thief has lost a house. Its the principle though.

                  • luddybuddy [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    20
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    What good is principal?

      • possibly a cat@lemmy.mlB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        deleted by creator

        • SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          This is so well written I can’t disagree with it. My original concern still remains, however.

      • PaulSmackage [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        2 years ago

        fred-hampton

        • SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yup.

the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

Subscribe from Remote Instance

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net
lock
Community locked: only moderators can create posts. You can still comment on posts.

It’s the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances’ admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1 user / day
  • 10 users / week
  • 37 users / month
  • 134 users / 6 months
  • 3 local subscribers
  • 16K subscribers
  • 4.94K Posts
  • 120K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • KiaKaha [he/him]@hexbear.net
  • MiraculousMM [he/him, undecided]@hexbear.net
  • corgiwithalaptop [any, love/loves]@hexbear.net
  • VILenin [he/him]@hexbear.net
  • replaceable [he/him]@hexbear.net
  • CARCOSA [mirror/your pronouns]@hexbear.net
  • UI: 0.19.11
  • BE: 0.19.12
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org