• Magnetic_dud@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      No, it’s to point out that this “anti abortion” policy is all about punishing those whores that had sex outside wedding, as if it’s something you do alone and not with a man.

      If they really care about minimizing the abortion rate, they should enact policies that help the woman after birth, and not give decades of financial struggles as “punishment for having fun that night”

      Personally, I am pro-“let the people do what the fuck they want with their bodies”

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s anti-abortion. “Pregnancy is free and kids can make you money, so anyone who has an abortion is obviously an evil monster.”

      What a weak fucking argument. As if it’s always an economic decision.

      • Martineski@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        I questioned my reading comprehension because when I made the comment it had 5 upvotes and 1 downvote. But now that I know for sure it’s a really messed up thing to say. WTF…

      • Magnetic_dud@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Absolutely misunderstood, it’s just to point that with the current policies, even 25 years olds in a relationship will feel pregnancy as a huge economic problem and choose abortion over bankruptcy

        And for victims of rape, underage, when there’s a congenital problem that has been discovered in the early exams, the abortion should be even encouraged by the doctors