HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Science@beehaw.orgEnglish · 1 month agoLet em looselemmy.dbzer0.comexternal-linkmessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up1287arrow-down10
arrow-up1287arrow-down1external-linkLet em looselemmy.dbzer0.comHootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Science@beehaw.orgEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-squareranandtoldthat@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·30 days agoPeer review is false security, so much bad and fraudulent science gets through, but due to the stamp of authority people are less skeptical. Additionally it’s harder to publish good science. There’s a lot of people who understand this better than me who can explain it. Here’s one starting point. https://www.experimental-history.com/p/the-rise-and-fall-of-peer-review
Peer review is false security, so much bad and fraudulent science gets through, but due to the stamp of authority people are less skeptical. Additionally it’s harder to publish good science.
There’s a lot of people who understand this better than me who can explain it. Here’s one starting point. https://www.experimental-history.com/p/the-rise-and-fall-of-peer-review