• deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    16 days ago

    I get why opportunists want to flood it with slop.

    What I don’t get is why anyone would want to watch slop when there is plenty of real content made every day.

    • kabi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      The “baby pushing random buttons on youtube” market is immense, highly profitable, and a permanent wild west.

      On Sh*rts, you don’t choose the content, the content chooses you.

      I am skeptical about the extent “normal youtube” will be plagued by this, but mostly I am apathetic, and hope to hear about it as little as possible.

      • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 days ago

        Why do you think people should watch AI slop instead of actual creativity?

        • Ogma@futurology.todayOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          Some of the most popular films of last year include Venom: The Last Dance, Beetlejuice Beetlejuice, and Bad Boys: Ride or Die.

          Actual creativity is much less popular, idky

  • Lugh@futurology.todayM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    Human attention is a finite resource. There aren’t enough people to be interested in all this AI auto generated slop. If anything a deluge of AI-generated slop will make people more interested in focusing on humans they find interesting.

  • psud@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 days ago

    AI video I have seen (mostly on human channels which are debunking them) are pretty low quality.

    I might be tempted if it was up to the standard of the lemmy AI communities

    • Ogma@futurology.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      It’s good for a lot of things. Even certain shots in high-budget films.

      Mostly I just want to see filmmaking that isn’t capital-intensive.

      • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I really don’t want to see it in high budget films, personally, because I believe they will find a way to monopolize it and take it way from everyone else. Won’t be the first time…