BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agoMozilla opposes Web Integrity API proposalgithub.comexternal-linkmessage-square45fedilinkarrow-up1523arrow-down16cross-posted to: degoogle@lemmy.mlwebdev@programming.devfirefox@lemmy.mlfirefox@fedia.iotechnology@beehaw.orgtechnology@lemmy.mlfirefox@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1517arrow-down1external-linkMozilla opposes Web Integrity API proposalgithub.comBlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square45fedilinkcross-posted to: degoogle@lemmy.mlwebdev@programming.devfirefox@lemmy.mlfirefox@fedia.iotechnology@beehaw.orgtechnology@lemmy.mlfirefox@lemmy.ml
minus-squarefolkrav@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·edit-22 years agoI don’t think saying Firefox/Mozilla is against standards is a fair assessment. https://mozilla.github.io/standards-positions/ What they state is that this specific proposal means more hurdles to access the internet as an end user with no clear benefit, as it doesn’t really achieve its stated end goal of reducing spam/bots/etc.
I don’t think saying Firefox/Mozilla is against standards is a fair assessment.
https://mozilla.github.io/standards-positions/
What they state is that this specific proposal means more hurdles to access the internet as an end user with no clear benefit, as it doesn’t really achieve its stated end goal of reducing spam/bots/etc.