BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agoMozilla opposes Web Integrity API proposalgithub.comexternal-linkmessage-square45fedilinkarrow-up1523arrow-down16cross-posted to: degoogle@lemmy.mlwebdev@programming.devfirefox@lemmy.mlfirefox@fedia.iotechnology@beehaw.orgtechnology@lemmy.mlfirefox@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1517arrow-down1external-linkMozilla opposes Web Integrity API proposalgithub.comBlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square45fedilinkcross-posted to: degoogle@lemmy.mlwebdev@programming.devfirefox@lemmy.mlfirefox@fedia.iotechnology@beehaw.orgtechnology@lemmy.mlfirefox@lemmy.ml
minus-squarecpjoa@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoAnd those bots will have to see every ad
minus-squareCrypticCoffee@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoIt isn’t just about ads. It us about denying access to a service. This could happen for more than ad blocking. Ads is probably an excuse, but forcing people to use a particular software for access is the opposite of a free web.
And those bots will have to see every ad
It isn’t just about ads. It us about denying access to a service. This could happen for more than ad blocking. Ads is probably an excuse, but forcing people to use a particular software for access is the opposite of a free web.