PugJesus@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoWerewolf nudity rulelemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up1186arrow-down14
arrow-up1182arrow-down1external-linkWerewolf nudity rulelemmy.worldPugJesus@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-squareTheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down1·2 months agoIf there were complaints, it makes one wonder if the model is anatomically correct and fully functional.
minus-squaresmokin_shinobi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·2 months agoThey weren’t in the movie at least.
minus-squareArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 months ago anatomically correct Well I suppose if a movie was intended to be very realistic, then… fully functional What!?
minus-squareAlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoDisplay mannequins in clothing stores get guest complaints if they’re naked, they’re not even anatomically correct there’s just a bump for the naughty bits on the male ones!
If there were complaints, it makes one wonder if the model is anatomically correct and fully functional.
They weren’t in the movie at least.
Well I suppose if a movie was intended to be very realistic, then…
What!?
Display mannequins in clothing stores get guest complaints if they’re naked, they’re not even anatomically correct there’s just a bump for the naughty bits on the male ones!