• Successful_Try543@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I think it can bee seen in two ways: Either he married his wife, because she manipulated him to do so, or he married her to take advantage of her manipulative abilities (My wife is good at X. – Why did you marry her? – Because she is good at X.).

      That said, I don’t know about the authors intention. Yet, to me it seems more likely that it’s the first option.

    • YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      I am not a woman or a wife, but I kind of get this one as someone who has been manipulated into more than one engagement. It’s obviously needlessly gendered but the relationship aspect of the joke is relatable. Manipulative narcissists are everywhere.

    • Allonzee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      People still make jokes about husbands being pigs in need of training, so yeah.

      It’s called equality.

    • GladiusB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Because saying “I got manipulated by a grifter” and then explaining why doesn’t have the same effect. Having a spouse is relatable. Most people are invested and then it switches. That’s what most comedy is.

      Stand ups generally should have artistic freedom.

      • Solumbran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        The same joke could have been made with anything else. A boss, a friend, who cares.

        And yeah, the artistic freedom is what people also use to defend Ricky Gervais when he spends 10 minutes saying that kids who get raped enjoy it, that’s a very bad sign when you end up having to resort to that argument to defend a joke.