• partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    24 hours ago

    and it seems like you’d want to keep workers rather than exercise dominion over them.

    They don’t want to keep workers. Most of the RTO operations are pseudo-stealth layoffs. Companies want to reduce headcount and this is a way to make people leave without having to pay out severance or unemployment insurance claims. So this is cheaper for the company.

    • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I should remind everyone that this is one of the most unethical ways to handle the people who have made money for the company they served for years. Any company that uses this strategy deserves to be bankrupt, and their leadership be made poor.

      If they can’t treat their employees like human beings, they deserve no future success.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        21 hours ago

        It’s also worth noting that pseudo-layoffs like this often lose the best people first. Those who have the most options

        • leisesprecher@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          The sad thing is, for companies on the scale of Dell, performance of individual workers (those who actually create value, maybe their direct superiors) is almost irrelevant.

          There’s so much red tape, so much “aligning”, meetings, pointless communication and pointless rituals that hardly anyone gets anything done. And in those 5min you’re doing actual work, it’s almost irrelevant how good you are.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I hadn’t considered that. My company, though large, is private and doesn’t have to appease shareholders, so they still see value in keeping skilled employees.