source xcancel or twitter

It’s becoming clearer and clearer that we’re looking at a seismic shift in the US’s relationship with the world, between:

  1. The US dismantling its foreign interference apparatuses (like USAID 👇)
  2. Marco Rubio stating that we’re now in a multipolar world with “multi-great powers in different parts of the planet” and that “the postwar global order is not just obsolete; it is now a weapon being used against us”
  3. The tariffs on supposed “allies” like Mexico, Canada or the EU

This is the US effectively saying “our attempt at running the world is over, to each his own, we’re now just another great power, not the ‘indispensable nation’.”

It looks “dumb” (as the WSJ just wrote) if you are still mentally in the old paradigm but it’s always a mistake to think that what the US (or any country) does is dumb.

Hegemony was going to end sooner or later, and now the U.S. is basically choosing to end it on its own terms. It is the post-American world order - brought to you by America itself.

Even the tariffs on allies, viewed under this angle, make sense, as it redefines the concept of “allies”: they don’t want - or maybe rather can’t afford - vassals anymore, but rather relationships that evolve based on current interests.

You can either view it as decline - because it does unquestionably look like the end of the American empire - or as avoiding further decline: controlled withdrawal from imperial commitments in order to focus resources on core national interests rather than being forced into an even messier retreat at a later stage.

In any case it is the end of an era and, while the Trump administration looks like chaos to many observers, they’re probably much more attuned to the changing realities of the world and their own country’s predicament than their predecessors. Acknowledging the existence of a multipolar world and choosing to operate within it rather than trying to maintain an increasingly costly global hegemony couldn’t be delayed much further. It looks messy but it is probably better than maintaining the fiction of American primacy until it eventually collapses under its own weight.

This is not to say that the U.S. won’t continue to wreak havoc on the world, and in fact we might be seeing it become even more aggressive than before. Because when it previously was (badly, and very hypocritically) trying to maintain some semblance of self-proclaimed “rules-based order”, it now doesn’t even have to pretend it is under any constraint, not even the constraint of playing nice with allies. It’s the end of the U.S. empire, but definitely not the end of the U.S. as a major disruptive force in world affairs.

All in all this transformation may mark one of the most significant shifts in international relations since the fall of the Soviet Union. And those most unprepared for it, as is already painfully obvious, are America’s vassals caught completely flat-footed by the realization that the patron they’ve relied on for decades is now treating them as just another set of countries to negotiate with.

  • SkingradGuard [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 days ago

    I think we’ll see China saving the US empire once again.

    How do you think this will happen? Trump blames China for literally everything, and his base are foaming at the mouth for war with China as much as the propagandists for the ruling class are.

    • xiaohongshu [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      You forget that when Nixon and Mao met, China just fought America less than 20 years earlier with 180k deaths and 200k wounded/disabled on its side.

      As bad as the US-China relationship is right now, I guarantee you it was much worse back then during the Cold War, when the world was on the brink of nuclear annihilation.

      Like heck, China today is still talking about resuming friendship with the US. You realize that Mao was literally openly taunting the US into dropping its atomic bombs and see which country would survive longer. Mao repeatedly talked about fighting a “ten thousand years war” (lol) against American imperialism even until the final day of the world’s destruction. This kind of language simply does not exist in today’s Chinese diplomacy.

      How do you think this will happen?

      As I said, if Wall Street enters China en masse, then the dollar hegemony will be saved, takes a good cut on BRI (and thus the global supply chain), Trump gets to boast about how he reduced the trade deficits that “China has been robbing us from”.

      China gets to revive its slumping economy, relieve the local government debt burden, resume its development and bringing more people out of poverty and improve their living standards, at the expense of giving up its monetary sovereignty.

      It’s win-win for the US and China, but not so much for the rest of the world - Europe will lose the most out of everyone. A renewed status quo.