How would you feel if Recall Inscription’s inability to work on upgrade scrolls was extended to enchantment stones?

I think some nerfs to certain spells would make the cleric more in line with other classes. I wouldn’t say the spells are broken, but the number and variety of spells gives the class a versatility and survivability that, in my opinion, currently leads the other classes.

You’re generally going to get an enchantment stone at least once a run, provided you’re checking for secret rooms. Probably 2 or 3 if you get a ring of wealth, or lucky weapon. Having 4 or 6 enchantment stones is a luxury only the cleric can have fairly easily.

EDIT: This spell is kinda bonkers with a scroll of mystical energy. Even at Recall Inscription+1, the 9 turns of recharging gives enough 2 charges to your tome that you can use RI to eke out more charging for free. Optimally, you’d have RI+2 and use it after mystical energy has ended.

Heck, I wouldn’t mind if RI had a special clause against recharging your tome; like the thief’s Mystical Meal talent.

EDIT2: You can also use Mnemonic Prayer to eke out a bit more; provided you’re a priest and invested in the spell.

I think I would just hard nerf RI to just runes and rule out stone of enchantment. But then many will probably complain.

  • 00-Evan@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    We’ll see how things turn up after the release of v3.0 but atm recall inscription is showing as surprisingly balanced. I do agree it has to pretty powerful edge-cases though, which might bump up the power of the spell as more people discover and start using them.

    Much like the Duelist, the Cleric is a character with a very high ‘top speed’, if the player is very skilled, but for the moment I’m mostly concerned about ‘cruising-speed’, or how well they do with the average skill player. Based on that metric the Cleric is actually slightly weak at the moment!

    • sirxdaemon@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Personally, I think balancing the potential is future-proofing because sooner or later, exploits will be adopted. But in reality, oftentimes a wait and see approach is used when there’s a lack of current data to indicate an issue.