You are the one trying to remove nuance by implying any way you can insult a Nazi is legitimate. How about we call them low IQ genetically inferior race traitors too? That will really show them
Ooh we’re doing name-calling now. I threw in my opinion that disagrees with the notion that “there are no bad tactics, only bad targets” and took issue with one of the jabs in a 2-for-1 bumper sticker and not only did you feel the need to justify it purely over the target of the sticker (a cybertruck owner), but also to go on a screed about the got-dang SJWs ruining everything with their complaints about everything being problematic. You needed to put me in the “liberal sjw” box so you could avoid engaging with my arguments, and then feign surprise when I don’t argue back in completely good faith. Jesus fucking Christ.
Well it’s bigoted for a gay person to call someone a cocksucker as an insult as well. Reclaiming a slur/targeted insult doesn’t include using it for harm. Internalized homophobia is a thing and it’s not a “librul ess-jay-dubyuh” thing but actually a pretty well documented social phenomenon.
Amazing. You wrote a wall of text without ever addressing what I said. It’s obvious you don’t want to actually have a conversation so now you are just rambling.
If you actually read it you’d notice I did in fact address what you said in there. This back and forth is getting so pedantic it’s actually just amusing to keep up at this point.
You realize arguing against your own strawman is not addressing my argument right? I guess you just convinced yourself that I actually said “any type of insult is acceptable”. I never said that. YOU said that. Everything you’ve said since then has been pointless rambling and arguing against something I never said.
You are the one trying to remove nuance by implying any way you can insult a Nazi is legitimate. How about we call them low IQ genetically inferior race traitors too? That will really show them
Thanks for ignoring everything I said and responding with a straw man. Good job.
“Nuh uh. You are! And here’s a totally different thing that removes all nuance so I can ignore what you just said!”
That’s literally how you just replied. I guess you have no interest in actually discussing this because you’ve gone full circle into stupidity now.
Ooh we’re doing name-calling now. I threw in my opinion that disagrees with the notion that “there are no bad tactics, only bad targets” and took issue with one of the jabs in a 2-for-1 bumper sticker and not only did you feel the need to justify it purely over the target of the sticker (a cybertruck owner), but also to go on a screed about the got-dang SJWs ruining everything with their complaints about everything being problematic. You needed to put me in the “liberal sjw” box so you could avoid engaging with my arguments, and then feign surprise when I don’t argue back in completely good faith. Jesus fucking Christ.
Well it’s bigoted for a gay person to call someone a cocksucker as an insult as well. Reclaiming a slur/targeted insult doesn’t include using it for harm. Internalized homophobia is a thing and it’s not a “librul ess-jay-dubyuh” thing but actually a pretty well documented social phenomenon.
Amazing. You wrote a wall of text without ever addressing what I said. It’s obvious you don’t want to actually have a conversation so now you are just rambling.
If you actually read it you’d notice I did in fact address what you said in there. This back and forth is getting so pedantic it’s actually just amusing to keep up at this point.
You realize arguing against your own strawman is not addressing my argument right? I guess you just convinced yourself that I actually said “any type of insult is acceptable”. I never said that. YOU said that. Everything you’ve said since then has been pointless rambling and arguing against something I never said.
Then what are you saying?