President Donald Trump slammed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy for suggesting that the end of Russia's war against Ukraine likely "is still very, very far away."
By believing the lies. Willingly. Repeatedly. Publicly.
Your lack of critical thinking and accountability towards those gutting our government is willfully delusional. If you’re not a Russian asset, you’re a useful idiot.
Because AP News and Reuters are two of the most politically neutral sources that exist.
Exactly. So if they would have no problems calling Trump a fascist if they believed he were one. Because they report FACTS and not OPINION. So if Trump being a fascist were a fact, they’d say it.
I’ll entertain your bad faith argument once more and then I’m done:
Reuters and AP don’t need to call him a fascist. He already is one by his actions. Just like they don’t need to tell us a non-profit is a liberal organization when reporting on their efforts.
really?
You’ve made a believer out of me /s
(That /s means I wasn’t serious, it’s short for “that was sarcasm” just getting ahead of your bullshit early)
If he’s such a fascist, then how come AP news or Reuters doesn’t call him a fascist? Do you know more than they do?
There’s less political backlash when I say it. I couldn’t give a rat’s ass about alienating you. You know this but you bring nothing but bad faith.
Says the person who admitting to making up russian asset bs, and admitted to saying it just to troll. lmao
If I thought there was hope for a real conversation, you might get an ounce of respect. But you sold out long before I showed up.
How did I sell out?
By believing the lies. Willingly. Repeatedly. Publicly.
Your lack of critical thinking and accountability towards those gutting our government is willfully delusional. If you’re not a Russian asset, you’re a useful idiot.
You’ve already admitted that you use the “russian asset” insult as a way to troll.
Because AP News and Reuters are two of the most politically neutral sources that exist.
Their not calling Trump a fascists is not the standard used to validate truth. Trump is a fascist by definition. This is not up for debate.
Exactly. So if they would have no problems calling Trump a fascist if they believed he were one. Because they report FACTS and not OPINION. So if Trump being a fascist were a fact, they’d say it.
I’ll entertain your bad faith argument once more and then I’m done:
Reuters and AP don’t need to call him a fascist. He already is one by his actions. Just like they don’t need to tell us a non-profit is a liberal organization when reporting on their efforts.
They are by their actions.