Obvious as it may sound, people with authoritarian beliefs hiding behind free speech actually consider it as a weakness akin empathy. It allows losers like them to amplify their reach despite not being in power. They abandon their “free speech absolutist” postures the moment they think they are in power.

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    No, it doesn’t mean that. Think about what you are suggesting.

    • uienia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      36 minutes ago

      No tolerance for the intolerant in a tolerant society. It has been thought about a lot.

    • PotatoLibre@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Read the same story the other day. They missed Hitler’s escalation believing he will never lie to such a point, until he did and then it was too late.

      If someone has a dictatorship as a goal, you can’t just fight under the democratic rules, especially if your system is not bullet proof.

      I’m not saying “grab a gun”, I’m saying there’s not much time to act. Anyway, this gives me some hope:

      https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20190513-it-only-takes-35-of-people-to-change-the-world

    • comfy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      True. We should instead just use one bullet for each and be done with them, no point in copying their atrocities.