cm0002@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 个月前Microsoft's quantum computing claims slammed as 'fraudulent'www.windowscentral.comexternal-linkmessage-square75fedilinkarrow-up1484arrow-down111
arrow-up1473arrow-down1external-linkMicrosoft's quantum computing claims slammed as 'fraudulent'www.windowscentral.comcm0002@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 个月前message-square75fedilink
minus-squareLv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·3 个月前 until it’s better we should simply ignore this That seems like a strange comment to make. How will it get better if we don’t spend the time and effort to make it better?
minus-squareImgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·3 个月前With quantum computing if you ignore it you are simultaneously not ignoring it?
minus-squareTreczoks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·3 个月前The idea is not to have three worthless announcements per week. They can get better all they want, and come back once they have tangible results.
minus-squaredaniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·3 个月前Many people in lemmy is highly primitivist and tech conservatives. Meaning that they don’t actually want any technological progress.
That seems like a strange comment to make. How will it get better if we don’t spend the time and effort to make it better?
With quantum computing if you ignore it you are simultaneously not ignoring it?
I don’t think so, but yes.
The idea is not to have three worthless announcements per week. They can get better all they want, and come back once they have tangible results.
Many people in lemmy is highly primitivist and tech conservatives. Meaning that they don’t actually want any technological progress.