It was one of the most dramatic and radical policy reversals in European Union history. In less than 48 hours, Germany not only executed a seismic shift in its domestic budget policy but also suddenly pushed to rewrite the EU’s fiscal rules it itself helped to draft.
Brussels welcomed the first move as a long-overdue response to years of urging Germany to invest more, rather than let itself be constrained by a constitutional limit on borrowing.
But the second? That was seen as a unilateral move — an overcorrection that unsettled even Germany’s closest allies.
To me that does not suggest a shortcoming of the Euro as a concept but a severe lack of authority on the part of the EU. Ideally, member states would not even be able to run their own economic policies in a unified economic zone and would have that managed by the EU as well. Yeah, half-assing a federation will always have half-assed results.
I do not think I can get behind that claim. What’s the implied relationship here? Heterogeneous wealthy nations + time + marginal economic inequality = nationalism?
deleted by creator
No, I understand your train of thought in terms of context. Economic and social strife leading to dissatisfaction with established economic and political systems is not a very controversial equation. I just don’t understand that inevitable “= fascism” conclusion that you’re drawing.
Surely that entirely depends on how that dissatisfaction is channeled? From Machtergreifung to Glorious Revolution and every flavor of action and even non-action inbetween.
deleted by creator