It was one of the most dramatic and radical policy reversals in European Union history. In less than 48 hours, Germany not only executed a seismic shift in its domestic budget policy but also suddenly pushed to rewrite the EU’s fiscal rules it itself helped to draft.

Brussels welcomed the first move as a long-overdue response to years of urging Germany to invest more, rather than let itself be constrained by a constitutional limit on borrowing.

But the second? That was seen as a unilateral move — an overcorrection that unsettled even Germany’s closest allies.

  • splendoruranium@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Individual countries don’t have an exchange rate, the ability to devalue their currency, and until now, where Germany now decides to build itself a huge army, the ability to run deficits to manage downturns.

    To me that does not suggest a shortcoming of the Euro as a concept but a severe lack of authority on the part of the EU. Ideally, member states would not even be able to run their own economic policies in a unified economic zone and would have that managed by the EU as well. Yeah, half-assing a federation will always have half-assed results.

    the Euro has accentuated differences between countries in it, ultimately contributing to the rise of the far right.

    I do not think I can get behind that claim. What’s the implied relationship here? Heterogeneous wealthy nations + time + marginal economic inequality = nationalism?

      • splendoruranium@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        My claim is that the economic inequality experienced in peripheral Eurozone countries will contribute to the rise of fascism in those countries.

        The context being an economic/political liberalism that provides no credible alternative to arrest the reduction in quality of life for poor/former working class people.

        No, I understand your train of thought in terms of context. Economic and social strife leading to dissatisfaction with established economic and political systems is not a very controversial equation. I just don’t understand that inevitable “= fascism” conclusion that you’re drawing.
        Surely that entirely depends on how that dissatisfaction is channeled? From Machtergreifung to Glorious Revolution and every flavor of action and even non-action inbetween.