Other questions include whether science organisation receives funding from China and whether it is a climate or ‘environmental justice’ project
Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.
A problem with scientism is that it worships “scientists” regardless of their actual output. There is nothing inherently good about having a job as a “scientist” especially under capitalism. Many of these people are at best mindless drones serving hegemony, and at worst overt fascists.
From your linked article:
"While the term was defined originally to mean “methods and attitudes typical of or attributed to natural scientists”, some scholars, as well as political and religious leaders, have also adopted it as a pejorative term with the meaning “an exaggerated trust in the efficacy of the methods of natural science applied to all areas of investigation”
That "worshipping " wording is, by your own sources, a political act.
Pulling a definition out of your arse and then judging a whole group of people based on your made up beliefs… You’re not an anarchist, you’re a trumpist in decline, pitching people against each others instead of standing up for others.
Look at their username. Couple that with their commentary and it’s one to steer clear of.
Just say you celebrate illiteracy
Man, i was gonna watch the V miniseries again tonight but this comment is making it too on the nose.