• boredsquirrel@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        True. Windows 10 is atrocious. I have to say, a debloated Win11 feels almost too good.

        So, lets focus on making Linux distros shiny and easy to use!

        • vfsh@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 days ago

          If you don’t think the modern Linux distro are shiny and easy to use, how long has it been since you tried? There are plenty of feature complete distros that are shiny and modern and comfortable to start using as a lifelong windows user

          • huquad@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 days ago

            I tried switching to linux permanently three times. Each time it got easier and more polished until eventually I didn’t go back.

          • Zerush@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            I use PC before MS DOS times and I also used several Linux distros in the past, last Kubuntu and Mint, always in dual boot. But I never saw big advantages above a gutted Windows, but problems with a lot of apps which I needed. Currently I’m on a heavy cleaned W11 which works fast, stable and exactly how I want 100%, why because of this I have to change it, installing another OS? There are no practical reasons for it.

          • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.netOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            I am daily driving Linux…

            Mainstream distros are not great products. Downstreams like uBlue do a good job, but have their own issues.

        • Zerush@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          That is the point, but Linux, as said above isn’t for everyone an option.

          Comments in the web:

          **Linux faces several key challenges that limit its broader adoption and effectiveness: **

          1. Software Compatibility Major commercial applications like Adobe Creative Suite and industry-standard business software often don’t run natively on Linux[1]. While alternatives exist, they frequently lack feature parity or full compatibility with industry file formats.

          2. Hardware Support Complexity Device drivers and hardware compatibility remain inconsistent. According to ZDNET, even basic tasks like printer setup can require manual configuration[2]. Multiple competing package formats (deb, rpm, flatpak, snap) create confusion for software installation[3].

          3. Fragmented Development Focus The Linux ecosystem suffers from too many competing distributions and desktop environments. As MIT researcher Jonathan Birge notes, “It’s downright laughable that an OS with single digit market share would further dilute its market share by having two competing desktops”[4].

          4. Learning Curve Despite improvements in user-friendly distributions like Ubuntu, Linux still requires more technical knowledge than Windows or macOS for many tasks[1:1]. The command line remains necessary for certain operations, intimidating new users.

          *(With this point I am not in total agreement, Windows with its plug & play and intuitive UI only SEEMS more simple, but to remove the bad habits, bloatware, telemetrias and other crap, are required a more advanced user to get it, entering quickly into Comanche territory. I think that Windows need a more advanced user as modern Linux distros) * 5. Support Structure Unlike commercial operating systems, Linux lacks centralized support. Users must rely on community forums and documentation that can be overwhelming for beginners[3:1]. Enterprise-level support often requires expensive consulting contracts.

          1. Market Share Impact With desktop market share around 3%, many software vendors can’t justify developing and maintaining Linux versions of their applications[4:1]. This creates a negative feedback loop - fewer applications lead to fewer users, which leads to less software development.

          Summary: the best OS is allways the one which best fits the individual needs, a perfect OS for everyone don’t exist. Every OS has its drawbacks, certainly Windows the most, but at least it’s possible to fix.


          1. 7 Reasons Why Linux Isn’t Dominating the Desktop OS Market - MUO ↩︎ ↩︎

          2. Why don’t more people use desktop Linux? I have a theory you might not like - ZDNET ↩︎

          3. What Are the Disadvantages of the Linux OS (Operating System)? ↩︎ ↩︎

          4. Why Linux is failing on the desktop | Jonathan Birge ↩︎ ↩︎

    • lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’d just replace Rufus with Ventoy. 😉

      Best concept for a piece of software I’ve discovered after being a happy Rufus user for years. 🙂

      • vfsh@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        Ventoy is so goated, I used Rufus then Balena for ages, then YUMI, and finally Ventoy. I’ve got a 128gb tiny USB attached to my phone case with every OS and utility I could need with over 80gb still free for file storage. Being able to download an iso and copy it with no software is huge, like in an emergency I could download an ISO on my phone if needed

      • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Guys can you please read the post before writing random nonsense.

        1. This is for people NEEDING windows only software
        2. Ventoy is useless for the things I want to achieve. Rufus allows to change a bunch of things with a single click, like offline account, cloud, telemitry, bitlocker
    • chaoticnumber@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’m one of those morons that really hates himself so is running systems that are highly optimized (hardened, custom kernels, no systemd) and all I can say, yes, mint cheff’s kiss

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        Exactly. I used to play with installing different Linux distros all the time, just to see what was available. And when you use Linux Mint, your computer just fucking works. You install the damn thing, and then you just use it, and use it, and use it until the fucking wheels fall off.

        • chaoticnumber@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Yeah, its damn solid. In the same vein I am testing the atomic release of fedora, really hard to break that thing, same goes for bazzite.

          Now i’m thinking … an atomic release of mint would be … wow

          • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            I don’t know much about atomic releases. Is that in any way similar to immutable distros such as NixOS? If so, and you ran mid in that way, it ought to be damn near impossible to break.

          • Smee@poeng.link
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I’d ask them to consider their dependence on windows only apps. If they want help with installing linux I’m happy to help, but I’m not an enabler there to help perpetuate their negative dependence.

              • Smee@poeng.link
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 days ago

                Sure, many jobs require people to use unethical, but legal tools and methods. I used to work somewhere like that - and what ever OS they had installed was irrelevant because it was their equipment, their systems and I didn’t use work stuff for personal things.

                But really, are you describing someone dependent on a job or someone dependent on certain windows-exclusive applications? Are they forced to use their personal equipment for work stuff?

    • iamtherealwalrus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      I know you think you’re being clever. But what you really are is arrogant. Telling someone the answer to their problem is to do as you do, instead of helping them with their issue.

      • Smee@poeng.link
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I refuse to help people with installing any versions of windows out of ethical reasons, just like some tattooist refuse to tattoo people in the face or give them similarly stupid tattoos.

        Yes, I’m arrogant enough to think I know better than those who haven’t considered the issue at all.

          • Smee@poeng.link
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            I think it’s a rather human thing to do, explaining oneself when refusing to lend a hand. I also think warning friends, family and those I care for about what I consider dangerous to be quite nice.

            I suppose we just have to agree to disagree about how we interact and care for our fellow humans.