If rolled out widely, this would make web browsers and third-party YouTube clients without a DRM license unusable for YouTube playback, download, etc. This would include almost all open-source web browsers and almost all third-party YouTube clients. Archive link to reddit post about this

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    6 days ago

    Already paid in personal data before I was smart enough to try and close the faucet, I don’t see why I should pay more

    • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      33
      ·
      6 days ago

      Because prices change. You can stop using it if you don’t feel the value is there.

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 days ago

        Alright, so is my current data worth more or less than my old data? Is my old data worth more or less today than, say, 3 years ago? I don’t see a reason to pay if Google refuses to let people know how much they are worth to them, first.

        • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          23
          ·
          6 days ago

          YouTube was acting a loss leader for years.

          Your data has increased in value since then, so has the cost to run the service. These things aren’t some mutually exclusive bubble. This is not how businesses are run, certainly not public traded companies. Many consumers do find the value in a $22/mo video + music sub. We use it a lot.

          I have no expectations of a free experience and I get nearly all my families entertainment media via a single subscription. If they raise it beyond my expectations I will steal it or look elsewhere depending on the quality of the content at that time.

          But for now, it’s a fantastic service.