• Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          10 days ago

          That’s stupidly simple and describing it as “including currency manipulation and trade barriers” is ridiculous.

      • MarmiteLover123 [comrade/them, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        So 10% seems to be the default/minimum for countries that have no or little tarrifs on the US. The made up numbers like 97% is not to do with the countries actual tarrifs, but their trade deficit to the United States and total US export. So let’s take Cambodia: $12.3 billion dollar trade deficit with the United States, and U.S. goods exports to Cambodia: $321.6 million. 12.3/321.6 = 0.038, rounded down to 0.03. 1-0.03=0.97, or 97%. I haven’t checked the others, but this seems to be how the numbers are calculated.

        Nah this is wrong the figures are wrong, had a brain fart above. It’s US imports from country, not exports that are used. The explanation below is right:

        US trade deficit with South Africa: $8.8 billion. US goods imports from South Africa: $14.7 billion. 8.8/14.7 = 0.598, or 59.8%.

        US trade deficit with Cambodia: $12.3 billion. U.S. goods imports from Cambodia: $12.7 billion. 12.3/12.7 = 0.969, or 96.9%.