Wothe@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoWho are those people who still let Big Tech piss on their face, thinking it is the lord of the rain?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square67fedilinkarrow-up1985arrow-down142
arrow-up1943arrow-down1imageWho are those people who still let Big Tech piss on their face, thinking it is the lord of the rain?lemmy.worldWothe@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square67fedilink
minus-squareHello Hotel@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·edit-22 years ago> I support the improvements in advertising Minipulation sucks > UX, and design innovation that data collection yields Companies can make a better product or use it to better make dark patterns > and I reject utterly that it is an “invasion of privacy” “Jane doe and 5 others clicked the button scedule marrage counciling she moved her mouse in a tistinct way, unique to her, she also today went to e21” Vs “6 people clicked the button scedule marrage counciling from the home page compared to 0 on the scedule marrage counciling page” > with the same enthusiasm as I reject “keeping your money in banks is for suckers” Dont call your critics crazy,threat modeling keeps you sane > and “the government tracks you through your phone” Are you a direct target? If not, automated tracking can be defeated by automated tools. Dragnet surveillance witch gets better every year with AI. But can be defeated If you are an active threat to the us like MLK (wikipedia, NPR) Malware brokers and Espionage are employed Edit: complete rewrite
minus-squareSCB@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down6·2 years agoI’m quite aware. I just told you I worked in the credit processor sector.
minus-square1847953620@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·2 years agoYou can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make it drink.
minus-squareHello Hotel@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-22 years agoI edited my post to be less reactive
minus-squareHello Hotel@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoSo your saying its not black and white. I dont disagree, some data collection is harmless.
minus-squareUncleGooberleg@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-22 years agodeleted by creator
> I support the improvements in advertising
Minipulation sucks
> UX, and design innovation that data collection yields
Companies can make a better product or use it to better make dark patterns
> and I reject utterly that it is an “invasion of privacy”
scedule marrage councilingshe moved her mouse in a tistinct way, unique to her, she also today went to e21”Vs
scedule marrage councilingfrom thehomepage compared to 0 on thescedule marrage councilingpage”> with the same enthusiasm as I reject “keeping your money in banks is for suckers”
Dont call your critics crazy,threat modeling keeps you sane
> and “the government tracks you through your phone”
Are you a direct target? If not, automated tracking can be defeated by automated tools.
Dragnet surveillance witch gets better every year with AI. But can be defeated
If you are an active threat to the us like MLK (wikipedia, NPR)
Malware brokers and Espionage are employed
Edit: complete rewrite
I’m quite aware. I just told you I worked in the credit processor sector.
You can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make it drink.
I edited my post to be less reactive
So your saying its not black and white. I dont disagree, some data collection is harmless.
deleted by creator
What?