• andypiper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 days ago

    Have you looked at the Digital Public Goods Alliance at all? I don’t understand your comment here, or how it relates to the news story shared.

    • GolfNovemberUniform@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      My comment wasn’t related to the organization. It was about the spirit of the Fediverse and how it imo actually hurts the society.

      • green_red_black@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        The “spirit” is individual control of their respective social media activities.

        If you know of shit people you can block them. If it’s a specific instance you can block that to, even defederate. Hell if your just someone that wants a private place to upload dank memes and share with co-workers and nothing else under the Fediverse you can create your own 100% private instance.

        I really don’t know what of the Fediverse made you go “because assholes use it, it means the Fediverse likes it.”

        • GolfNovemberUniform@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Hell if your just someone that wants a private place to upload dank memes and share with co-workers and nothing else under the Fediverse you can create your own 100% private instance.

          I know but this is different. This is not social media. I wish the Fediverse and especially Mastodon stopped calling themselves social media because they are not one.

          I really don’t know what of the Fediverse made you go “because assholes use it, it means the Fediverse likes it.”

          I’m a supporter of the “the community is how its majority is” opinion and in this case the majority is questionable. Sure I can join an instance ran by people I support (not that there are any that I’m familiar with because all of them get bullied by the majority) but it’ll basically be just a group chat with additional features. A true social media should accept everyone who follows the rules imo. That way there can be a real conversation with different opinions. What the Fediverse is doing is just a natural version of Big Tech algorithms.

          • green_red_black@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            It is though? Mastodon is designed to work like twitter but without the bs bots, ads, and such.

            That’s the thing of the Fediverse, the rules are defined by who runs the instance, so once again if there is a problem with an instance you can just pack up and move or even make your own instance with rules that you prefer.

            What the Fediverse does is nothing like the Big Tech Algorithms. With Silicon Vally the algorithms is designed for getting as much engagement as possible (particularly with ad content as that’s what pays their bills) in the Fediverse the “algorithm” is entirely what you the user set up.

            For me as an example I set to only get Lemmy posts from communities I am subscribed to and from newest to oldest. This means it doesn’t matter how trendy some post from “Chinastan” community (made up for explanation) is, I myself will not see it because I am not subscribed to said community.

        • GolfNovemberUniform@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          It was on topic enough imo because of the words “public good” being present but well there goes the regular Fediverse toxicity.