• jmf@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Not a strict guide, but privacy wise the earlier in the 2010s the better. If you can find a low mileage 90s/2000s that’s even more simple and less connected, but you begin to enter the age issue where everything rubber is disintegrating. Pretty much to care about your privacy in a car you have to become a little bit of a gearhead to keep some simple old beater healthy and maintained.

    • mergingapples@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Currently driving a 2008, it’s just not holding together very well regardless of what I am doing. Just replaced the motors for the electric windows, took all of one month for one of them to fail again.

      • jmf@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        What make and model if you don’t mind me asking? Certain brands definitely cheaped out on the build quality around that time. I find older cars (late 90s, early 2000s) built by Toyota, Volvo, Mercedes, and BMW to be of incredible construction.

        • mergingapples@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Mazda 3. Engine is mostly fine, but the interior is just dying. Overall I’d call it well built for the price… But almost 20 years takes its toll.

          • jmf@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Those are good older cars! Did you replace the motor with an aftermarket unit or OEM part? One thing I have learned is with some components, getting the cheapest one can line you up for doing the job again in no time.