Article

Voters in the largest city in America are choosing a Democratic nominee for mayor via ranked-choice voting. The crowded field is led by former governor Andrew Cuomo, who resigned from the state’s top office four years ago following sexual harassment allegations; state Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani, who snagged key endorsements from Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-New York); Comptroller Brad Lander, who made headlines when he was arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement at an immigration hearing last week; and City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams.

This is a ranked-choice primary – only first-choice votes will be tabulated on election night. Final vote calculations will be released July 1 and updated weekly until all ballots are counted. Republican Curtis Sliwa is uncontested in his primary.

    • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s a bit tomato tomahto. In theory, if Israel recognizes equal rights for Palestinians, then that’s great and it would be a one state solution. In practice, that will never happen as long as “Israel” occupies Palestine. So if he was running for a position where his beliefs about Occupied Palestine actually mattered, I would want him to be pressed on how he thinks Israel should become a country where equal rights for Jews and Arabs are upheld, because that’s the difference between liberal zionism and antizionism (liberal zionists would be happy to just wait for equal rights to materialize from nothing, antizionists believe in resistance and overthrowing the occupiers).

      • sempersigh [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        . In practice, that will never happen as long as “Israel” occupies Palestine.

        I think he already knows this and his position is to not do any “no nos” and to at most lie by omission rather than lie outright. Would he have won if he didn’t play that game anyway? Tough to say at this point; perhaps it would have been closer but I think he actually would have but I don’t think zohran thought he would have at the time

        imagine if everyone in the west bank/gaza and the diapora could vote to elect seats into the knesset… it would never happen… but we could just advocate for it anyway and use it as a shield to beat the zios back with and what can they say? this would never happen but if it actually did I could only assume the knesset would at some point vote to change the name of the state to palestine.<---- no liberal zionist actually desires to allow this to happen but zohrans position was to exist in this weird position of thought so he didn’t have to sacrifice his views on the question of Palestinians while still being able to stay stuff like “israel has a right to exist with equal rights” .

        • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah I absolutely agree which is why I said it’s only a technical difference, not to mention it simply doesn’t matter as mayor of NYC. He’s a good lad.

        • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          32
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Palestinians in the West Bank literally live under military occupation, are not protected by Israeli law, and are tried at Israeli military courts. And Arab Israelis are still broadly discriminated against in an Apartheid system that’s internationally recognized as such. Just one example: Jewish neighborhoods are required to be built with bomb shelters, while Arab neighborhoods have no such requirement and it must be requested for a shelter to be built; in practice, they are almost never built. That’s why casualties from rocket attacks on Israel are disproportionately Arab Israelis. And that’s the situation for Arab Israeli citizens!

        • Kumikommunism [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          That is just not true at all. Just look at court cases involving Arabs in Israel. I know that you have done absolutely zero research on the subject and won’t respond to anything anyone says.

                • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  22
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  It’s literally apartheid. Imagine if the US still had Jim Crow with all the anti-miscegenation laws. On paper, the races are separate but equal, but in practice the fact that people in a minority group can’t marry into the majority group keeps wealth segregated (and reproduces the hierarchical racist structure). The same is true in Israel, obviously, the Palestinians are majority non-Jewish and are forbidden from marrying into Jewish families (who, by the nature of colonialism, hold the vast majority of wealth and power in Israel) unless they give up their religion. That’s apartheid.