• phuntis@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    just because they legally have to doesn’t mean they physically have to though they could still not invite you in

    • badcommandorfilename@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Invited in by who though? You might say the owner, but then that means that kids or tenants don’t count. So it might be “anyone with authority to do so”, which would include judges following the prescribed process…

      • Zagorath@aussie.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        It could also just be “anyone lawfully inside already”, which would allow the owner, kids, tenants, or even guests, but not a judge.

    • Libb@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I meant: the warrant would equal an invitation to enter one’s home, an invitation decided by the judge to which, as a law abiding citizen, the place owner would be forced to comply with.