• frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I did. The United States followed everything it says. It just doesn’t say to do very much.

          • frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Not at all. You clearly haven’t read what’s actually in there.

            Clinton didn’t think Congress would ratify strong guarantees. Ukraine itself wasn’t in a position to ask for much more, because it didn’t have the economy to afford to maintain nuclear weapons. The result is an agreement that aggression against Ukraine would be brought up with the UN security council, and that’s about it.

            In providing military aid, the US has exceeded what was promised.

            • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Article 5 has:

              such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force

              which might also be thoughts and prayers while Trump is in the White House and

              Any such armed attack and all measures taken as a result thereof shall immediately be reported to the Security Council. Such measures shall be terminated when the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to restore and maintain international peace and security

              which is basically what was offered to Ukraine.

              • frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                14 hours ago

                Nope, not at all comparable. The US does not puppet master the UN Security Council. It can bring the matter up, and it has. Russia has veto power on the same council. Nobody expects anything to come of that, but the requirements were met.

                • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  14 hours ago

                  NATO requirements are also fully met if the US deems that doing nothing is the necessary action and informs the Security Council.

                  • frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    14 hours ago

                    There is so much more context behind that. The two are not at all comparable.

                    The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognized by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.

                    Any such armed attack and all measures taken as a result thereof shall immediately be reported to the Security Council. Such measures shall be terminated when the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to restore and maintain international peace and security.”

                    You’re completely ignoring what happens in the first paragraph of NATO Article 5. The Security Council only comes into play if they get off their ass. The Security Council rarely gets off its ass, because too many countries that hate each other have veto power. NATO will continue operations for the defense of its members regardless.

                    None of that is true of the Budapest Memorandum. They bring it up with the Security Council, and that’s it.

                    Are you going to keep digging this hole?