Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youāll near-instantly regret.
Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.
If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutānāpaste it into its own post ā thereās no quota for posting and the bar really isnāt that high.
The post Xitter web has spawned soo many āesotericā right wing freaks, but thereās no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iām talking redscare-ish, reality challenged āculture criticsā who write about everything but understand nothing. Iām talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyāre inescapable at this point, yet I donāt see them mocked (as much as they should be)
Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnāt be surgeons because they didnāt believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canāt escape them, I would love to sneer at them.
Film photography is my hobby and I think that there isnāt anything that would prevent from exposing a displayed image on a piece of film, except for the cost.
Depending on film it might not be easy to tell exposing an image from a real picture.
The āhybridā digital instax cameras work this way, itās just a digital camera that has a way to internally expose the picture on the instant film.
Itās trivial to do analog prints from digital images too, just requires an inkjet printer and a special film to print out the ādigital negativeā.
The only way in which it may succeed as a deterrent is that it actually costs some money (film and processing is not cheap) and requires actual work to do those extra steps.
I expect the ārequires actual workā part will work well in deterring AI bros - theyāre lazy fucks by nature, anything more difficult than āpress button for instant gratificationā is gonna be a turn-off for them.
Well, the other thing is that except for the instant film, thereās no instant gratification in this hobby. Even when one processes at home, the typical time form a photo to a print is measured in hours.
Glass plates it is, then. Good luck matching the resolution.
In all seriousness though I think your normal set up would be detectable even on normal 35mm film due to 1: insufficient resolution (even at 4k, probably even at 8k), and 2: insufficient dynamic range. There would probably also be some effects of spectral response mismatch - reds that are cut off by the filmās spectral response would be converted into film-visible reds by a display. Il
Detection of forgery may require use of a microscope and maybe some statistical techniques. Even if the pixels are smaller than film grains, pixels are on a regular grid and film grains are not.
Edit: trained eyeballing may also work fine if you are familiar with the look of that specific film.