Lemdro.id
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Yuritopiaposadism [none/use name]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 16 days ago

If you ask me, President Xi went easy on Jack Ma.

hexbear.net

message-square
39
link
fedilink
173

If you ask me, President Xi went easy on Jack Ma.

hexbear.net

Yuritopiaposadism [none/use name]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 16 days ago
message-square
39
link
fedilink
  • purpleworm [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    Him being a Party member is completely meaningless if you’re talking about his political views or something, but the OOP is ludicrously exaggerating what was done with Ma while excluding the rampant corruption and financial crimes he oversaw. (see below)

    • HarryLime [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      16 days ago

      excluding the rampant corruption and financial crimes he oversaw.

      Sorry, what is this referring to? To my knowledge, his big transgression was trying to popularize some kind of banking and investment tool, which was illegal because of state control of finance.

      • Keld [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        51
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        His company was involved in a bribery scandal involving Zhou Jiangyong, one of China’s biggest corruption scandals, “Ant Group” owned by Jack Ma was the primary beneficiary of the corruption done by Zhou. They’ve also been fined billions for various other financial crimes, including basically not complying with any financial regulations and scam loans to consumers, and it hasn’t stopped them.

        I don’t know if that’s what purpleworm is referring to, there’s plenty of other shady shit to pick from. Jack Ma is a billionaire piece of shit (Tautological as that is) with all that entails.

      • purpleworm [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        16 days ago

        My characterization was hasty, but he did get in trouble for both things that I mentioned, albeit with “rampant” only applying some of the time.

        Here’s a highly hostile article discussing the corruption aspect:

        https://www.globallawtoday.com/business/2025/04/jack-ma-indicted-the-legal-and-political-fallout-of-chinas-move-against-its-most-prominent-entrepreneur/

        Here are some other crimes, some of which are financial and some of which are not:

        https://www.amlintelligence.com/2023/07/news-chinas-ant-group-pays-984m-fine-for-aml-and-corporate-governance-failings/

        I guess “failure to meet anti-money-laundering obligations” is adjacent but not itself a financial crime. Here’s an article that mentions what you mentioned, along with mentioning “high-risk lending activities, with leverage ratios of 50-60 times, raised serious concerns among regulators”:

        https://www.benzinga.com/markets/24/11/42175308/the-fall-of-ant-groups-ipo-alibabas-missteps-legal-battles-and-a-433-5m-settlement

        There are a lot of different charges, which I guess is kind of what you’d expect when a massive company that the CPC had previously turned a blind eye to suddenly falls under intense scrutiny.

        • Keld [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          16 days ago

          I think if you are involved in multiple corruption scandals and one of them is bad enough that a person involved is sentenced to death (Later changed to life imprisonment) rampant is a fine descriptor.

      • jackmaoist [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        16 days ago

        He was also going wild over 9-9-6 so that probably pissed a fuckton of people off.

chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don’t post low-hanging fruit here.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 752 users / day
  • 1.5K users / week
  • 2.31K users / month
  • 4.78K users / 6 months
  • 4 local subscribers
  • 14K subscribers
  • 20.8K Posts
  • 305K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA [he/him]@hexbear.net
  • MiraculousMM [he/him, undecided]@hexbear.net
  • corgiwithalaptop [any, love/loves]@hexbear.net
  • PorkrollPosadist [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
  • ZoomeristLeninist [it/its, they/them]@hexbear.net
  • EmmaGoldman [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
  • sweet_pecan [love/loves, they/them]@hexbear.net
  • a_little_red_rat [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
  • khizuo [ze/zir]@hexbear.net
  • gaystyleJoker [she/her]@hexbear.net
  • thelastaxolotl [he/him]@hexbear.net
  • context [fae/faer, fae/faer]@hexbear.net
  • Infamousblt [any]@hexbear.net
  • Sulvy [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
  • UI: 0.19.11
  • BE: 0.19.12
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org