• Literally everything undermines the OSA. It fundamentally goes against the internet. My friend shouldn’t have to give up her ID to Reddit just so she can view a post about a dental issue that got marked as NSFW on Reddit (for all the bootlickers who are like “it’s just to stop kids from viewing porn!”. Making everyone hand over their most sensitive info to dozens of companies (which profit off of and share said info) just makes people less safe. Remember the Tea app?

    If you don’t want kids watching porn, actually, I dunno, be a parent and supervise them??

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    3 days ago

    They’re thinking too small. It’s not just VPNs. The whole architecture of the Internet undermines the OSA. So long as people are able to casually send IP packets to places deemed unsafe, we will remain trapped in this hellish digital nightmare where UK citizens can communicate freely with whoever they please around the world.

    • imdc@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      You joke but if you think the aim isn’t bigger… I wouldn’t be surprised if astroturfed discourse around decentralised platforms being unsafe because they can’t be “moderated” surfaces in the next few years (months?). Mastodon have already had to explain why they literally cannot add age verification in the UK. They’ll just ban the whole concept if they can’t get the control. The free web is being reigned in.

  • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s a good job the upper chamber is full of knowledgeable members that have grown up as digital natives and understand the architecture of the internet.

    Oh wait…

  • Leraje@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s not great obviously but I’m not sure the word ‘debate’ is accurate.

    According to the Lords schedule for next week, this is the only mention of VPN’s I could see. And an oral question is literally that - a question;

    “Oral questions are not intended to give rise to debate, and should be drafted in such a way that the minister can make their initial reply in no more than 75 words. Proceedings on each question, including supplementary questions and answers, are limited to ten minutes.”