• ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Which means they are capable of carrying explosives and that couldn’t have been known if they were or weren’t before being shot down. It’s possible I don’t know the technical definition of “decoy” but that sure doesn’t fit the description to me from a layman’s understanding.

      • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Decoy means they are designed to waste Ukrainian anti air rockets and munitions by having them believe they are explosive drones. It’s literally what a decoy drone is. That is why they are shaped similar to the Shahed so people cannot tell the difference from afar.

        • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Perhaps I’m conflating “decoy” and “dummy”. But if one of the drones had real, actual explosives in it I don’t see how it’s a waste of resources to defend yourself from them.

          Or am I misunderstanding what you mean when you say there were explosives found. Is the point that these drones, even if carrying explosives, we’re not actually capable of detonation?

          • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            I read rumors one single drone allegedly held a small amount of explosives (like 4pounds/2kg). I’m not sure if this was actually confirmed.

            Actual Shaheds can carry 100pounds/50kg of explosives.

            These Gerbera drones are not a more cost effective way of delivering explosives beacuse they also require a motor and other hardware. They are meant to deplete air defenses.