Joseph Hibbeln, a psychiatrist on the panel, raised the obvious concern yesterday, saying: “I’m unclear if we’ve been presented with any safety or data comparing before one month to after one month, and I’m wondering why one month was selected as our time point and if there are data to help to inform us if there’s greater risk of adverse effects before one month or after one month at all, let alone in negative mothers.”
This man is doing God’s work on this panel.
You can tell he knows what he’s doing when he uses “data” as a plural.
USA is cooked.
More a way to stop vaccines while maintaining deniability.
The vote would have been to stop the at-birth vaccine standard as it was, so not voting, (ie not changing it) will continue the vaccine to protect neonates from getting Hepatitis B.
My bad thought this was about the covid and flu vaccines. Should rtfa i guess.