let’s swap “dangerous” to “inevitable”
The writer is a distinguished visiting fellow at the Hoover Institution. He previously served as then US Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer’s national security adviser
:kill-bill-siren:
Also, from the comments:
Note to readers: amongst other corporate affiliations, Mike Kuiken sits on the Advisory Board of Sayari[1], a data intelligence and risk analysis company. They market themselves as a KYC-for-supply-chains tool, giving visibility into ownership and sourcing.
The author’s argument could be sincere and worthy of consideration, but he’s advocating “know your chip” regulations that would mandate exactly the kind of service Sayari sells. Kuiken’s corporate roles should at least be mentioned in FT’s author bio. Readers can decide for themselves if there’s a conflict of interest and if this matters to the argument.
“could be sincere” either a true believe in centrism or a person with a gun pointed at them typed that
This headline but instead of semi-conductors americans can’t seem to get enough of scrumptious chinese potato chips.
