• actionjbone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    “I’m a businessman, and I don’t care what makes a good game. I care about resource management.”

    • Poayjay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      “Why make a game worth playing twice if you can only charge them once?” -CEO

  • SmileyBMM@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Moreover, CD Projekt’s focus on The Witcher 3 was less on choices, and more on maintaining the quality of its storytelling in a much larger world. “The biggest thing was how we can deliver such a big game in the open world, keeping [the] great story of Geralt, and there were many doubts back then.”

    Honestly I agree that quality is more important than quantity. Many games have choices that are boring because the writing itself isn’t interesting (Fallout 4), would rather have a more linear experience with tighter pacing.

  • Agent_Karyo@piefed.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I liked the dual story flow structure in Witcher 2.

    I didn’t like how much more limited the maps were compared to Witcher 1 and the general trend of consolification in the sequel.

    • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Limiting the maps was a blessing. Chapter 2 of the first game sent you back and forth across multiple load screens to hit the furthest corners of the map just to draw it out.