• RexWrexWrecks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Well that makes sense.

    You’re much less likely to die when hit by a speeding bus than a slow car.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Yeah, I usually hear about speed limits as a time savings vs. safety issue. And in that sense it would apply to both.

    • Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I don’t think you understand what good infrastructure looks like, if you manage to get hit by a bus in Amsterdam you really fucked up.

      There are literally millions of drunk tourists here every year and they’re fine.

      • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        41 minutes ago

        I don’t think you understand what good infrastructure looks like

        i don’t think you understand what kinetic energy is. is you claim it is about safety, then bus doing 50 km/h is far more dangerous than passenger car in the same speed.

        There are literally millions of drunk tourists here every year and they’re fine.

        and these drunk tourists… are they also getting hit by a car?