• AppleTea@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    22 hours ago

    In a free market, competition has end results. Buisnes don’t just keep competing with one another ad infinitum. One of them eventually cant keep up and closes shop. It’s competitors expand into the space it previously filled. This process repeats until you have fewer and fewer firms that account for more and more of their sector of the economy. New business do not have resources to eke out space in an already filled niche.

    Under a long enough time frame, a free market creates less competition.

    • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Yep. People love free markets, but they really only benefit billionaires. The idea that free markets lead to a better society is bunk and should be abandoned along with every other capitalist lie.

    • vga@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I don’t remember that ever happening without government coercion. Can you refresh my memory?

      • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Sorry, do you think a business failing is only possible with government coercion?

        And what government coercion gave Google near monopolies on web search and video? Microsoft Windows accounts for 70% of desktop computers, did a government give them that? Whom did the government coerce for Amazon to have such domination of server hosting and online retail?

        I don’t think you’ve been paying close attention to whats been happening in your lifetime.