• originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 days ago

    i get the point, but good luck.

    it makes for a great policy but enacting a technical identifier somehow will be problematic. at some point you will not be able to discern a bad human programmer from a good ai

    • Riskable@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      We’re already at that point. It’s already impossible to tell if any given function or class was written by AI. You can only tell when the code is large; where the architecture reached the point where AI couldn’t keep it all inside the context window.

      Eventually the AI will write better code than humans and that’s when policies like this will seem very short sighted.

      • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        Eventually the AI will write better code than humans

        “In the year 2000, housewives will make dinner in a snap by putting a Thanksgiving Dinner capsule in the Food-o-Matic” energy

      • oranki@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Probably going to boil the oceans or starve some natural resource before that… AI can maybe write code like a bad human programmer, but us bad human programmers really don’t set the bar that high