I don’t know if this is the norm for other countries websites to do the same, but this seems kind of out of place for me. Is there is a reason, norm or is it related for something I don’t know?
Shouldn’t official government websites be only concerned about the people actually employed at them and decision makers?
Out of all the problems in the world, and you’re concerned with that??
The world does not work like that.
If that is really your opinion, go criticize the people who watch football and tell them: out all the stuff you could watch you are watching that??
The US has the First Lady doing stuff. So there is a precedent.
As far as I know, the White House website before trump(in Biden era) didn’t have really news related to Jill Biden.
I can’t say the same for Donald Trump, as he turned government websites into a circus, but before him there was almost no news releases about USA first lady in the white house website.
Note: I might be ignorant at the topic, as I am talking about the news releases in Biden administration specifically.
Nancy Reagan just laughs at this take.
Two day old account doing a little “look look Ukraine is doing something I’ll imply is bad.”
Two things:
- Where did I imply it’s bad?
- What does my account age have to do with anything?
Are you just connecting imaginary dots to satisfy your determined conclusions?
Where did I imply it’s bad?
Shouldn’t official government websites be only concerned about the people actually employed at them and decision makers?
“Why is X happening? It seems out of place to me.”
Your point?
That phrase implies (implies!) that X is bad.
Lol, it’s not even a spicy question like “Why is Zelensky posting photos with soldiers with Nazi symbols if his regime being Nazis is Russin propaganda?”, and you still got those “people” triggered XD
A job well done!
