Lemdro.id
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
lysdexic@programming.devM to C++@programming.devEnglish · 1 year ago

On harmful overuse of std::move - The Old New Thing

devblogs.microsoft.com

external-link
message-square
22
fedilink
29
external-link

On harmful overuse of std::move - The Old New Thing

devblogs.microsoft.com

lysdexic@programming.devM to C++@programming.devEnglish · 1 year ago
message-square
22
fedilink
Initial excitement leads to overuse.
  • Dani (:cxx: modules addict)@hachyderm.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    @lysdexic @QuadriLiteral Eh, no. Really. Changing the value category disables RVO

    • lysdexic@programming.devOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      RVO

      I recommend you read the thread.

      • Dani (:cxx: modules addict)@hachyderm.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        @lysdexic I did.

        • lysdexic@programming.devOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It doesn’t look like it, otherwise you’d be aware that the whole point of this submission is that casting return values with std::move disables RVO.

          • Dani (:cxx: modules addict)@hachyderm.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            @lysdexic You claimed otherwise:
            "
            These std::move invocations are harmless, as they only cast objects to their rvalue reference.
            "
            If you were right, we wouldn’t have the motivation to look at this in EWG.

            • lysdexic@programming.devOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              If you were right, we wouldn’t have the motivation to look at this in EWG.

              I am right. Not benefiting from RVO does not mean you’re harming anyone.

              Again, I recommend you read the submission and also the discussion.

C++@programming.dev

cpp@programming.dev

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !cpp@programming.dev

The center for all discussion and news regarding C++.

Rules

  • Respect instance rules.
  • Don’t be a jerk.
  • Please keep all posts related to C++.
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1 user / day
  • 19 users / week
  • 43 users / month
  • 196 users / 6 months
  • 2 local subscribers
  • 2K subscribers
  • 287 Posts
  • 568 Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Nihili0@programming.dev
  • lysdexic@programming.dev
  • UI: 0.19.8
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org