You must log in or register to comment.
In a statement to Reuters, a State Department spokesperson said the U.S. government does not have a censorship-circumvention program specific to Europe but added: “Digital freedom is a priority for the State Department, however, and that includes the proliferation of privacy and censorship-circumvention technologies like VPNs."
So what’s the advantage of using this portal over one of the many reputable vpn providers that already exist?
The big catch I see here is that the US is hardly an impartial player. Whatever form this “portal” takes will almost certainly bend toward the current administration’s world view. The bigger catch is going to be the inevitable data harvesting. I guaran-fucking-tee that there’ll be fuck-all in the way of privacy and security.
There aren’t “many reputable VPN providers” that are free. I guess that would be the main difference
I guaran-fucking-tee that there’ll be fuck-all in the way of privacy and security.
but but… they said “user activity on the site will not be tracked” 🙄
Someone finds CSAM on it in 3… 2… 1…
Portal? Thought those died in the 90s.
I assure you this term is very much alive and kicking in the IT B2B space.
What would stop this freedom.gov site from being blocked too?
I can see how this would be a positive, especially in China. It’s being framed as an attack on the EU, but it seems like it would have bigger implications elsewhere.