I remember an assignment we had was reading Chavs by Owen Jones, and based on that book it seems like sociologists agree that chav was never a subculture, it was the upper classes taking ordinary working class young people fashion and turned it into a made up, monstrous delinquent subculture to paint the working class people as bad or something. Owen Jones said it was not a subculture and nobody unironically identified as a chav. It was purely a classist insult.

  • Denjin@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 days ago

    SHUT UP ABOUT CHAVS, WHAT THE HELL DO YOU KEEP ASKING THIS QUESTION FOR? EVERY WEEK WITH THIS SHIT.

  • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    As I told you when your unhealthy obsession presented itself last week, Owen Jones is a political activist and polemical opinion columnist, not a sociologist.

  • heliotrope@retrofed.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Please get a life. If you’re a chav/ned/roadman, we honestly don’t care; nor do we give a fuck if you like them.

    I, a member of the working class from the north-east, have both close friends and sworn enemies across this demographic. Do I want to be a part of it myself? Not really. Do I care if other people do/are? Also no. You do you.

    Alternatively, if this is a hyperfixation, there are friendlier ways to approach it than accusing the Fediverse of classism.

    • Puni@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      What demographic? As I said, it’s not a subculture. It’s a caricature to mock the working class.

        • Puni@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          You mean normal guys in tracksuits/sportswear. That’s just the default working class/council estate fashion.

          • heliotrope@retrofed.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            I do not. What I am talking about is people (women included) who are generally loud, boisterous, admittedly a little threatening (though this stems from my past experiences), and who act with little to no regard for the feelings or wellbeing of anyone other than themselves. These aren’t hard and fast rules, of course.

            When I see roadmen around the city I now live in, they’re never causing any trouble: just hanging around, usually vaping, and that’s okay. The idea that everyone matching this description is a violent criminal is bullshit drummed up by the tabloids in order to scare old folk and distance them from young people. However, when I was in middle/high school, any dickhead who decided to be cruel to me or my brother for any reason would match this description every time — with the exceptions of two specific boys, who were posh twats. At the same time, many of my friends then and now either fit this description or have the lifestyle usually attributed to the stereotype.

            The clothing is just a correlation.

            • Puni@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              Those just sound like idiots who happen to dress in mainstream working class fashion trends. Not members of a subculture.

  • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    “chavs” are a real thing. not a subculture but just, scum on the streets

    not sure why youre so obsessed with them though